i attended a talk yesterday about the “Ethics of Bedside Rationing” – mostly focused on the question of who gets scarce medical resources like kidney and liver transplants… a colleague (someone not born in the U.S.) asked a question about whether it would matter in the choice betwee two identically-situated transplant candidates (same prognosis before and after transplant, same age, same clinical status) if one of those candidates had 3 dependent children who relied on him, and the other had no dependents. the speaker said, categorically, “No”. which , I think, is a reflection of a great divide between thinking in America (where there tends to be an emphasis on the “individual”) and other parts of the world, where community ties carry more weight.
Janaki
Thoughts about multinationalism, multiculturalism, and multiple interests in life.Meta
Blogroll
Categories
Archives
- May 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (10)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (2)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (8)
- July 2011 (6)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (7)
- November 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (2)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (3)
- April 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)